## Summary
LanLinkProviderTest fails on Windows. This patch fixes that.
I believe the root cause is that we are using a shared UDP socket to listen for identity broadcasts both in the LanLinkProvider and in the test. Apparently this works on Linux, but on Windows the LanLinkProvider picks up its own identity packet and pairs with itself.
This patch gives a parameter to LanLinkProvider to allow it to listen and broadcast on different ports, then uses that ability in the test to make the test pass on Windows.
## Test Plan
### Before:
lanlinkprovider test fails, first because it can't bind its UDP listener socket, and then because Windows seems to handle shared sockets differently than Linux, so the UDP broadcasts were not reaching the test's listener.
### After:
lanlinkprovider test seems to pass reliably both in my Windows VM and in the CI
pluginloadtest and sendfiletest are crashing. This patch fixes that by allowing Daemon::init() to be called from TestDaemon
## Test Plan
### Before:
Both tests are crashing because it is not able to find any devices. It is not able to find any devices because the LanLinkProvider is not being added because Daemon::init() is not being called.
### After:
pluginloadtest and sendfiletest pass
Summary: This tells the new notification system that we're copying a file and lets it show a better summary.
Test Plan:
{F6821356}
Is the composite job stuff already merged? That probably needs adjusting too
Reviewers: #plasma, nicolasfella
Reviewed By: nicolasfella
Subscribers: kdeconnect
Tags: #kde_connect
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D21182
Summary:
As mentioned on telegram, there are some fundamental issues with bluetooth. The only approach I could get working was multiplexing: manually sending multiple streams of data over a single connection.
This is the description of that multiplexing protocol. I have an implementation of this protocol, but I'd first like some feedback to see if this is what we're going to use before finishing up those patches.
See the document itself for more details. I make the protocol forward-compatible, although I don't expect we will need ever that.
Test Plan: None, this is just a description.
Reviewers: #kde_connect, andyholmes, albertvaka
Reviewed By: #kde_connect, albertvaka
Subscribers: albertvaka, kdeconnect
Tags: #kde_connect
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D17987