mirror of
https://codeberg.org/ziglings/exercises.git
synced 2024-12-27 01:46:29 +00:00
54 lines
1.7 KiB
Zig
54 lines
1.7 KiB
Zig
//
|
|
// There have been several instances where it would have been
|
|
// nice to use loops in our programs, but we couldn't because the
|
|
// things we were trying to do could only be done at compile
|
|
// time. We ended up having to do those things MANUALLY, like
|
|
// NORMAL people. Bah! We are PROGRAMMERS! The computer should be
|
|
// doing this work.
|
|
//
|
|
// An 'inline for' is performed at compile time, allowing you to
|
|
// programatically loop through a series of items in situations
|
|
// like those mentioned above where a regular runtime 'for' loop
|
|
// wouldn't be allowed:
|
|
//
|
|
// inline for (.{ u8, u16, u32, u64 }) |T| {
|
|
// print("{} ", .{@typeInfo(T).Int.bits});
|
|
// }
|
|
//
|
|
// In the above example, we're looping over a list of types,
|
|
// which are available only at compile time.
|
|
//
|
|
const print = @import("std").debug.print;
|
|
|
|
// Remember Narcissus from exercise 065 where we used builtins
|
|
// for reflection? He's back and loving it.
|
|
const Narcissus = struct {
|
|
me: *Narcissus = undefined,
|
|
myself: *Narcissus = undefined,
|
|
echo: void = undefined,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
pub fn main() void {
|
|
print("Narcissus has room in his heart for:", .{});
|
|
|
|
// Last time we examined the Narcissus struct, we had to
|
|
// manually access each of the three fields. Our 'if'
|
|
// statement was repeated three times almost verbatim. Yuck!
|
|
//
|
|
// Please use an 'inline for' to implement the block below
|
|
// for each field in the slice 'fields'!
|
|
|
|
const fields = @typeInfo(Narcissus).Struct.fields;
|
|
|
|
??? {
|
|
if (field.type != void) {
|
|
print(" {s}", .{field.name});
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Once you've got that, go back and take a look at exercise
|
|
// 065 and compare what you've written to the abomination we
|
|
// had there!
|
|
|
|
print(".\n", .{});
|
|
}
|