From 54f743ba43630a452f8104b5b21fbbcdeefe866f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chrboesch <chrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:18:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig
The sentence was slightly unclear
Signed-off-by: chrboesch <chrboesch@noreply.codeberg.org>
---
exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig b/exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig
index 1e39935..24cf2fa 100644
--- a/exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig
+++ b/exercises/108_labeled_switch.zig
@@ -46,9 +46,10 @@
// 3. In the case '2' we repeat the same pattern as case '1'
// but instead the value to be evaluated is now '3';
// 4. Finally we get to case '3', where we return from the function as a whole.
-// 5. In this example as the input has no clear exhaustive patterns but a essentially
-// any u8 integer, we need to handle any case that is not explicitly handled
-// by using the `else => {}` branch as a default case.
+// 5. In this example, since the input does not have clear, exhaustive patterns and
+// can essentially be any `u8` integer, we need to handle all cases not explicitly
+// covered by using the `else => {}` branch as the default case.
+
//
// Since step 4 or a break stament do not exist in this switch, the debug statement is
// never executed